My pick goes to the 4000X RGB, which although it carries a $40 premium over the 4000D and 4000D airflow, comes with one additional fan, controls them via PWM instead of voltage-controlled, adds some classy RGB, and you get a very pretty glass slab – the 4000X RGB does enough things right to justify its premium.Ĭorsair’s RGB implementation is second to none. Or, if you’re a new builder looking to set up a gaming rig with one of Nvidia’s brand-new cards, there’s plenty to like here too. ![]() If you were a fan of the original Corsair 350D or 450D, then you’ll like the new 4000 series cases. The 4000D Airflow behaves like any mesh case does, trading blows with the likes of the Phanteks P500A. Similarly, it’s also nearly the quietest, so the restriction provided by the glass panel at the front does do something to keep the noise down.īut truth be told, if you’re looking at the 4000X RGB, you’re probably planning to use the included fans, and you’re probably looking at using an all-in-one liquid cooler for your CPU anyway. ![]() The 4000X RGB is the warmest running case in our standardized test suite, but it’s also among the first to have a closed glass front panel. The standardized tests clearly show what each of the cases are built for. The above tests are then repeated, but because the Corsair ML fans have absurdly high maximum speeds, we run those at 50% duty for the tests as no case fan should ever need to run above those speeds. Up to three fans may be installed, preferably one at the default exhaust location and two at the front intake, in the biggest sizes the case supports. To correct for differences in case fans, for the standardized test we remove the standard case fans and replace them with Corsair ML120 or ML140 units. ![]() It might only have two fans, but it’s able to use them effectively to provide enough cooling to both the CPU and GPU. The 4000D Airflow performs like most mesh cases: great. Do yourself a favor and add an exhaust fan if you want good CPU temperatures (and a complete look), or use an AIO. This is down to the lavish intake 3 fans) providing the GPU with fresh air, but the CPU suffers a little due to a lack of exhaust. The AIRFLOW variant is available for either case, featuring an attractive mesh screen instead of a solid steel front panel, significantly improving airflow.Note that the 4000X RGB has a relatively high CPU temperature, but a low GPU temp. It blends comfortably into the rest of the design, but the yellow may not appeal to some builders. Otherwise, it will only fit a 240mm radiator.īoth cases come equipped with effective and easy to clean dust filters on the top and bottom, featuring a small yellow tab matching Corsair’s style. The case has space for only one at a time either a 360mm radiator in the front or a 280mm radiator on top if low-profile RAM is used. ![]() The 4000D still supports plenty of cooling setups, but its smaller size can become an issue with radiator placement. An additional radiator can also fit in the front of the case, and a push/pull 360mm fits in the top of the chassis. The 5000D’s inclusion of motherboard tray fans is the largest difference in cooling ability between the two, opening up additional possibilities for water cooling. In comparison, the 4000D includes a respectable 6x 120mm fan slots, 4x 140mm, and space for one radiator in 360mm, 280mm, or 240mm size. However, due to its increased size and radiator support, the 5000D takes the lead here, featuring a total of 10 possible 120mm fan slots, 4x 140mm, and 2x 360mm radiator slots. Both of these cases excel at cooling, offering a number of fan and radiator placement options.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |